Fairfax City Leaves Vienna in the Dust

Fairfax City Leveling Old Post Office for New Revitalization Effort
While we are forced here in Vienna into a complete stalemate on Maple Avenue, thanks to Maud Robinson's anti-everything attitude, Fairfax City is marching to a very attractive down town. We found this description of the Fairfax City vision from 5 years ago:
"The Fairfax City Council wants you to picture this: Shop at your leisure at a number of boutiques or small chain stores in the heart of its historic district. Dine at an upscale restaurant, or grab a bite at a more casual eatery. Attend cultural events or a movie, or hop aboard a CUE bus or trolley to catch a performance at the Concert Hall or Patriot Center. Finally, if you're from out of town, spend the night at a fine hotel in the city. And do it all without the hassle of driving a car and finding a parking space."
Consider the reality happening today:
Picture 1, Picture 2, Picture 3, Picture 4, Picture 5
Here is a link to their main site.
Nice job Fairfax City!
By comparison, here are links outlining Vienna's "moronic efforts":
Speaking of Post Offices, did you know that a new design for the Vienna Post Office was killed by Jane Seeman and Maud Robinson? So while Fairfax City gets a new City center, Vienna is stuck in the proverbial mud. And guess what? There is funding help out there. Tom Davis got money for Fairfax City. We are sure Davis could help move forward the redevelopment of Vienna's antiquated and dysfunctional Post Office! Why are we listening to Maud?





Comments
Where is the vast parking lots, strip mall, anti-pedestrian sidewalk flower beds, telephone poles, and multi-stop shopping? Booooooooooo! They should make it like Vienna!
Posted by: Maudite Crankasaur | May 27, 2006 04:06 PM
We get the "Town Green" and downtown Fairfax gets that?! I'm calling NO FAIR! This Vienna Resident is completely GREEN with envy.
Posted by: Envious | May 27, 2006 05:05 PM
From June 06 Town newsletter:
So, even back in 1976, they knew we needed a one-stop shop (re: department store)?! I'd love to see the 1976 Commission's full study - wonder if all their ideas were ignored just like they're trying to do today?!
Posted by: Town Shopper | May 28, 2006 09:20 PM
While Fairfax is off to the revitalization races Vienna will be kicking off its newly formed committee to study sidewalks on June 7th (no joke). Whoopie!
For you history buffs, the sidewalk study started as a suggestion in the 1910 Vienna Comprehensive Plan. Town Council acted on it in 1946 when they decreed by a 5-2 margin (Maud and Aristotle voting Nay) that the earth DID NOT NOT ORBIT the sun and that it wasn't actually an "evil plan" concocted by "devil-opers" to build 50 story buildings in town. Unfortunatley for us, Council also decided to put off the sidewalk study until it was absolutley certain that electricity was not "dark magic". Just last week Town Council unanimously voted that electricity was not "dark magic" but actual proof that Klingons are planning to invade earth.
Posted by: Vienna Klingon | May 31, 2006 01:46 PM
So, let's take a PROACTIVE position for our sidewalks and "Walk the Talk" (for the Walks...er...Talk the Walks...er...Talk...Walk... Me...Fence...er...)
The Town Meeting is at 7:30 at the Town Hall, on Wednesday, June 7th.
For more information (on the Sidewalk Seminar, not on the Design Seminar) Call Ailen Santiago - (Public Works) at 703-255-6389
Here's my Beef - If you guys want to complain, then you need to ATTEND the meeting, SPEAK your voice, and be counted on the Public Record...
No point preaching to the choir - D
Posted by: Deborah Brehony | May 31, 2006 08:36 PM
I agree with Deborah Brehony that 'bitching' slone is not the solution. However, the posts here and this web site in general are the VERY FIRST opportunity many in Vienna have had to look under the covers of Vienna's government. All of the posts above, sarcastic or not, serve a purpose. They teach. That's the first step.
Posted by: Historic Vienna | May 31, 2006 08:55 PM
Deborah B: Many have tried the friendly approach over the years and have lost their "Vulcan Minds" in the process. Unfortunately this hammer of a website and lawsuits are the only tools that get through to Town Council.
Posted by: Vienna Klingon | May 31, 2006 09:54 PM
Attend a Sidewalk Committee meeting? No thanks! How lame... a committee to talk about sidewalks... doesn't the Town employ someone smart enough to figure out a sidewalk plan? And if not, why not? How hard is it to CONNECT THE DOTS??? If somebody goes to this meeting, ask them:
This website is the most free-spoken, public record in Vienna! Plus we don't have to suffer amateur pronunciations and manipulations by the likes of Creed and Miller... "I'm not a lawyer, BUT garble, garble, garble..." Life's too short to go forth and get jerked around by people with a microphone who admit that they don't know what they are talking about and then proceed to prove it. Perhaps if it would make a difference, but it doesn't... Vienna is how old? and it is still talking about sidewalks!!!
Regarding Town Green vs. a public parking facility... if it were up to me, I'd raise the entire Maple Ave. strip and plant trees and grass, but that won't grow a viable business district. Everyone has to respect their priorities... the Town should plan and develop a thriving business district first... if they want one. Without such a plan, the Town Green is just someone's pet project regardless of where they put it.
DeborahB: Thank you for your posts. They are thoughtful, considerate, and worthwhile.
Posted by: Town Resident | June 2, 2006 10:48 AM
Well, TR - If you think my posts are Thoughtful, Considerate and Worthwhile then WHY suggest that my advice to attend the Sidewalk Meeting is LAME?
It's not a lame idea - Not lame at ALL - At least, now there is a group of poeple dedicated to studying the problem...That's a GOOD thing!
There ARE things in TOV that need change - I Agree - BUT - There are ALSO things in TOV that we can do (I sound so reptitive) PROACTIVELY to make a cahnge!
I do not think all is lost! I DO think we have a voice, and let me say that is a voice of Respect and Reason...
YOU, TR, sound as someone who has studied the Sidewalks extensively...I think you would be an EXCELLENT candidate to go to the meeting, and post exactly the questions that you raise...
All But One...If you study and know the "history of Presbyterianism", then you must know that we are pre-destined to do what we will do - So likely, we cannot help ourselves from jaywalking...It is our destiny, and we are bound by fate to do that...
LOL - You are so funny! So am I! I ALWAYS wait at the cross walk and go when it is my time.
My time will come. Deborah
Posted by: Deborah Brehony | June 2, 2006 07:09 PM
I just want to add an addendum because growing up it was SO FUNNY to me. We had all these "Cross Signs" in our NC Town that said "Yield to Pedestrians"...
Well, I was just starting out to READ, maybe 4-5-6 years old, I thought they said "Yield to Presbyterians"...
So, I went marching across the Main Street, thinking I was NUMBER ONE - NOBODY beats a "Pres"....
So, I GUESS, that is why we jay-walk. We just din't know no betta....D
Posted by: Deborah Brehony | June 2, 2006 09:17 PM
To continually presuppose that the contributors to this website have not tried for decades to be “proactive” or have “given up” is extremely naïve. Give us a holler when you realize that the TOV does whatever the Maudasaurus wants with no regard to input from beyond the 20th Century or basic property rights.
Posted by: Vienna Klingon | June 2, 2006 10:03 PM
DeborahB: Your suggestion to participate is not lame... we all appreciate the merits of civic involvement. What's lame is a Sidewalk Committee, another do-nothing garden-club style approach by the Town that puts the cart before the horse to fake public involvement adnauseum. We're talking sidewalks here... plan them everywhere people need to walk safely... prioritize them... and then build them going forward. Done... no committee required. If you read between the lines, you'll see that committees in Town are a part of the problem. They are used to publicize balanced opposition by those most likely to go forth and whine about their personal views on Town matters. Then the Town proceeds to do not much, seeming to appease and compromise with the handful of activists that bothered to show up. Sometimes I think the Town Mothers actually work to load these public hearings to get their preference voiced... and then proceed to use these staged outcomes to justify the action, or more likely, the inaction they desire to push through. The result is that no real work on the greater public interest is accomplished. Get some planning engineers to develop and show me a real firm sidewalk plan... then maybe I'll go to a public meeting to offer some helpful feedback. But don't ask me to listen to Joe Citizen go on for 20 minutes about why a sidewalk should not be built on his side of the street for fear he will suffer litter and dog walkers... yawn!
Posted by: Town Resident | June 3, 2006 09:50 AM
Question: Was there a Town Green Committee that invited residents to come forward to discuss whether or not the Town should pursue a Town Green project?
Posted by: Town Resident | June 3, 2006 12:39 PM
So there you have it... you'll never see the Town Council relegating a pet project to death by committee. And now we can look forward to the Town Green becoming plastered with plaques honoring this, that, and the Maud... it's hobby Town government.
Posted by: Town Resident | June 5, 2006 09:10 AM