Nostalgia v. Reality

Why Are Vienna Power Lines Above Ground on Maple Avenue?
The #4 Vienna Money Magazine ranking applied to a population of 60,000. That means the ranking far exceeded the borders of Vienna Town limits. This feedback was recently posted on the site from a non-Vienna Town resident. We reproduce it here to give it more visibility:
"The Vienna area has been my home for over 40 years and my beloved late wife and I sang in the OLGC church choir for over 25 years. So, I am not a Johnny come lately. Anyone who spends any time in Vienna soon realizes the ennui, lethargy and stasis, which characterize this community. Maple Avenue is frankly dreary--and seems destined to become even drearier as the years roll by. While filling stations, fast foods and parking lots are necessary it is daunting to face the fact that these have become the high spots of "Downtown Vienna." The one "jewel" is the Vienna Inn and its nostalgic "chili dogs with everything" and the reminiscences of us old timers who found it a convenient meeting place when our time with the "Company" permitted. As I accumulate the years, thinking progressively and imaginatively about the future is a mounting challenge--especially if one is preoccupied with small town charms and the appeal of yesteryear, but they are not real anymore in a metropolitan community like Washington DC and its suburbs. It is NOT leadership to resist inevitable change and refuse to adapt to the realities of accelerating change. While Alvin Toffler wrote "Future Shock" over 25 years ago, its central thesis is even more immediate and commanding than it was in 1980. The recognition and acceptance of revolutionary change in our society can only be resisted, avoided or obstructed at great expense, growing annoyance, and an increasing detriment to the common good and the ultimate welfare of our communities and society. We can see the results of such resistance to change in those backward areas of the world where the frustrations and accumulating disappointments of the masses induces the promotion of terrorism... It is the actual reality that the increasing velocity of change must be accommodated and even embraced by those who lead or aspire to lead in our world today. The alternative to accommodating such change, and indeed planning for it and using it for the promotion of the common good is grotesqueries such as the dismal panorama of Maple Avenue-especially during rush hours. It is not leadership to obstruct and play small town "Let's Pretend" (a delightful radio serial of fairy-tales of my youth). Those who will not lead should get out of the way and if they cannot find it in their hearts to help those who are willing to accept the challenges of the real world, they should at least move on without obstruction."





Comments
Yes, HV - This is a good and worthwhile Post - How I have fought to get you to be proactive and courteous at the same time... This Post says so much about what TOV needs for Our Future - and says it with a professional and democratic voice -
NOW - An idea for Action - I am willing to go "Door to Door" to talk to the Merchants on Maple Ave and quiz them on THEIR views and opinions for our Future.
I will then take that informaton to the new Maple Avenue Vision Study Firm for input.
Who will go with me? I can start walking on June 15th...I would like one of you to make us out a "Questionaire"/"Poll" with questions/opinions as to what the merchants along Maple Avenue are looking for with regards their future. If someone will prepare that, then I will pay to print and distribute it. I will make myself available to meet and greet every merchant and record their answers.
I am thinking we CAN do somehthing if we try.
Who will come forward and be with the team?
My house, on the 15th of June to start - Shall we say 6:00 - 7:30 pm? Deborah
Posted by: Deborah Brehony | June 3, 2006 10:58 PM
Didn't the Maple Avenue Vision Committee do this already over 3 years? Didn't they already spend the time to find out the views of merchants? People don't want more time wasted. The issue isn't what the owners of commercial property want, that is known. The issue is Maud Robinson standing in the way. Explain to us why this Town hired firm is only studying 123 between Beulah and Lawyers, but ignoring 123 between Lawyers and Nutley? There is no reason. This firm hired by the Town is another dog and pony show designed to produce no change.
Posted by: Historic Vienna | June 4, 2006 10:24 AM
Me thinks you protest too much. :-) And the credit for any post should rest with its author. You can't control what people say or how they say it, nor should you try. I think it is best to set your own example... and never take offense as this only derails one's reasoning.
As for taking a walk to survey constituent points of view, I suggest that is the Town Council's job... and they could surely use the exercise.
Posted by: Town Resident | June 4, 2006 11:44 AM