Weened on the Politcal Bosom of Mao Zedong: Chairman Carey Sienicki Makes Maud Proud
Last week we posted about the most recent Windover Heights Historic Review Board meeting. For background there are no rules regarding color in the historic district. While that is true, the Board still asks for "color". In an effort to get to the bottom of how the Board decides what color works and what doesn't a simple question is posed: what is the color palette to chose from?
Shrley Damon, who sits on the Board, immediately says there is no such thing as a color palette. Opps! The Chairman of the Historic Board Carey Sienicki then takes over in this telling 2 minute clip to try and correct Damon:
Sienicki thinks she has guidelines? She thought something different in 2004. We will address that lie in another post...
Immediately following that interchange with Sienicki, the situation escalates. Carey Sienicki starts to meltdown around 1:20 into the following clip:
What are the acceptable colors for the Windover Heights Historic District? There is no such list. The bigger issue here? Why does this woman twist herself into a knot over this issue? Clearly, she believes that if she says there is no color palette - the Town loses their court case. Some people will do ANYTHING to make Maud happy, even if that means losing all dignity in the process. Carey watch yourself on YouTube.com. Ask friends to watch you speak in public. Get some objective advice. Stop drinking the Kool-aid - it will make your lips "red".
Comments
Amazing. Damon blurts out there is "no such thing" and then to hear the dancing of words.
And to think they (Maud and her cronies like Sienicki) can get away with this just because they are on the other side of the podium. Egads, where in her life does she get justification to abuse people like this? Why do they do it? What makes an ordinary citizen, who gets anointed by Maud, think they can sit on the other side of the podium and treat you like you are their servants?
Amazing how this works. Amazing.
Posted by: Judge Alito | February 15, 2007 08:09 AM
WHAT RUBBISH! DOESN'T ANYONE ON THIS BOARD HAVE ANY ETHICAL UNDERPINNINGS? COLOR IS NOT ONE OF THE SEVEN CRITERIA OF THE ORDINANCE AND LITTLE ELSE IS EITHER AS IS KNOWN TO ANYONE (INCLUDING THE BUREAUCRAT IN THE ZONING OFFICE) READING THE ORDINANCE. IF YOU DON'T KISS MAUDE'S OR LAINE'S RING YOU MIGHT NOT BE APPROVED.
Posted by: HISTORIC LIES | February 15, 2007 04:21 PM
There is only one leader. You are all stupid. Sit down.
Posted by: Lenin | February 19, 2007 10:58 AM
No wonder the ToV doesn't want recording equipment used at meetings. And is Sienicki paid more for using "review over", not just "review" as is correct, in every response?
Posted by: Mark L. Solomon | June 22, 2007 09:58 AM