Are We Allowed to Call a Liar a Liar?
A new poster calling him/herself 25-year-resident posted tonight:
"Historic Vienna" and "Deep Throat" apparently believe that rudeness and name calling are tactics that can help them win rhetorical points. Those techniques are having the opposite effect. Congrats to Steve Rigby for his futile effort to speak dispassionately here. Best effort in a losing cause. And OBTW: Are the sponsors of this blog the same people who wanted to rezone Historic Vienna so that they could build condos and/or townhomes there? The same people who got trounced in the recent local elections [More here: 1, 2, 3, 4]? Just wondering.
Steve Rigby is a guy who works for one of Maud's long time board members Shirley Damon. Damon also likes to put lies out. Is that name calling? The evidence is on this site. It's not hard to digest. You can also see the Mayor lying too. Is calling someone a liar who is actually caught lying name calling? If so, expect us to continue the name calling. In terms of historic district condos, you are right!
Comments
That poster is either so naive that he or she would have easily followed Jim Jones to the Kool-Aid farm or that poster thinks everyone else is naive. Which is it?
Posted by: Historic Vienna | June 27, 2007 08:49 PM
How does one respond?
Posted by: more kool aid please | July 2, 2007 01:35 PM
HEY, WHAT'S WRONG WITH TOWN HOUSES IN THE ALLEGED AND UNAUTHENTICATED HISTORIC DISTRICT. THE TC ALREADY APPROVED AN OFFICE BUILDING THEREIN (VIA A CONSENT DECREE THEY AGREED TO). MOREOVER THEY AGREED TO A ROW OF 40 FT.+ TOWN HOUSES ON LOCUST ST SE THAT ARE ON A PIPE STEM LOT. TALK ABOUT FAVORITISM!
Posted by: HISTORIC LIES | July 9, 2007 11:53 AM