Lot Coverage Question: Help from the Community?
Feedback from a first time poster today:
I read your site all the time - people there seem to have a lot of info on zoning issues. What's the deal with the 25% lot coverage for single family residences? I'm trying to add a 475 sq ft addition onto my 1650 sq ft house. The lot is over 11,000 sq ft. My addition apparently comes to 25.5% lot coverage with my driveway and carport. The woman in the zoning office was the absolute least helpful, most willfully obtuse person I've ever met, to the point of jaw-dropping rudeness. I was naively shocked that someone like this is allowed to work in any government position. But my question is, how can Steve Bukont, who builds all over my neighborhood, get away with his lot coverage numbers? I've looked online at some of the plats where his houses are, and I come up with anywhere from 28 - 32 % coverage, just on the ones I've looked at. I agree that zoning laws should protect neighborhoods from improper construction. But the result here is that my neighborhood is being "protected" from my addition, but my neighborhood is NOT protected from the Bukont houses (which are okay looking, probably increase my property value, etc, but still...). How can this go both ways? What kind of variance does Bukont get? How can the rest of us get one, too? I'm furious that I can't expand my kitchen and family room because it would make my house "too big" (on a good-sized lot), but I'm surrounded by 4,000+ sq ft houses on similar sized lots. I would have posted this as a comment on your site, but I couldn't find a recent pertinent thread.





Comments
I would love to know the coverage on the house being built at 222 Battle Street SW. No way that is 25% lot coverage. It looks like half the lot is used.
Posted by: vienna mommy | August 30, 2007 05:00 PM
You're looking at footprint. The foot print of the house is not 4000 sq feet. That is the total square footage of the 2 floors. I'm guessing, you'd have to ask the town exactly what the lot coverage is that they calculated.
Posted by: hmmm .... | August 30, 2007 05:09 PM
I believe on some renovation projects around town (I can't speak to Bukont’s projects) they use permeable driveways to help in the lot coverage. There are a number of products around that allow the area of the driveway to be reduced (% reduction based on the product) and the area used toward your addition. I think several of the newer homes along Park Street SE use such products. It may seem like a stretch but it is within the limits of the regulations and allow this person to build their addition.
Posted by: Frank | August 30, 2007 05:10 PM
I know the footprint isn't 4,000 sq ft, but if you look at the county public records on plats, you can calculate the impervious sq footage (which includes driveway and patio). The county breaks it down very nicely and includes above grade sq ft footprint, so you actually can get an idea of lot coverage.
Yes, permeable surfaces are counted differently. Paver patios are counted at 80% (so a 100 sq ft paver patio would only count as 80 sq ft).
I don't have a problem with Bukont's houses, just to be clear. I just would like to be able to make mine nicer.
I guess I would welcome an answer from Deb Brehoney, if she's reading this - she probably knows?
Posted by: original poster | August 30, 2007 05:31 PM
It's all in who you are "original". I'm glad and sorry that you had to witness this first hand. It is an awful experience. Some go for variances and are struck down, whereas some get what they want first time. Then some people just add on and do what they can do, and it is not what they wanted. But I have to agree with you as to the zoning office personal, most of them go out of their way not to work with you. Greg Hembree always says to people who go in there first time "No, we don't grant variances." BS. The house across from Louise Archer got a variance for their house, and he is on the Hysterical Review Board. Maybe you need to go kiss some ___.
Posted by: The system is out of whack! | August 30, 2007 06:13 PM
SEPTEMBER 11 -PLANNING AND ZONING 7:30 AT TOWN HALL. I WOULD LOVE TO SEE SOME FOLKS GO AND ASK MR. HEMBREE SOME QUESTIONS!!!
Posted by: frustrated | August 30, 2007 06:22 PM
I just stepped off the house at 222 Battle St SW. It is roughly 90 feet long and 45 wide except the back 30 feet is about 42 feet wide. Per my rough calculation the total square footage is about 3960 Ft. excluding a driveway for a two car garage and a small deck. This lot is shown on the tax rolls as 13066 square feet. Did that last figure change?
Posted by: BIGFOOT | August 30, 2007 08:04 PM
I don't know the 222 Battle St house, but if you're right about the footprint, Bigfoot, that's about 30% lot coverage. And the driveway would count, if it's asphalt or concrete, so it would be higher than 30%.
There must be a simple answer to this question of why the new construction can have so much more lot coverage.
Posted by: original poster | August 30, 2007 08:31 PM
OK, are you ready? I just stepped off the lot at 222 Battle St. SW and came up with an estimated size over 16000 square feet. Obviously, based on the existence of two driveways, one on Plum and one on Battle St. the house there was built on two lots.
Posted by: BIGFOOT | August 30, 2007 09:16 PM
I don't mind Bukont's houses that much, but he certainly gets whatever he asks for from the town to build them... like the town land that he got to build the 800 block of Shady Drive SE in exchange for a small sidewalk and a bit of escrow money to keep it up.
Posted by: You're kidding me right? | August 30, 2007 09:35 PM
Just remember in this town its not a matter of right or wrong its WHO you know and do the power monkeys like you or not... There is no rhyme or reason for what they do in any facet of town government. You gotta be on the down low with the IN crowd...
Posted by: wanna wank | September 1, 2007 12:19 PM
The Town needs to beef up their staff to handle the growing demand for teardown/redevelopment oversight. They don't seem to be gearing up for what's happening in Vienna. Business as usual is not going to handle the load of rebuilding this Town.
Posted by: Town Green | September 1, 2007 06:58 PM
For the excellent service you received today at Town Hall, I just want to let you know, I'm giving your friend more days off! Here's to the lucky folks of Vienna who get to visit my Town Hall!
Vienna Officials Give Employees Extra Day Off
by BRIAN TROMPETER, Maud's Personal Staff Writer
(Created: Thursday, August 30, 2007 7:14 AM EDT)
Members of the Vienna Town Council recently voted 6-1 in favor of giving town employees extra days off on Friday, Dec. 26, 2008, and Friday, Jan. 2, 2009.
Christmas and New Year's Day will be on Thursdays next year, and the town sometimes gives employees an extra day off to bridge with the weekend.
“This will compensate for all the other times that I'm a Scrooge,” Robinson said.
Council member Michael Polychrones, who cast the sole nay vote, questioned why town employees did not have to give up a minor holiday, such as Columbus Day, during years when Christmas and New Year's Day fell close to weekends.
Posted by: Mother Maud | September 2, 2007 04:53 PM
There you have it... Maud admitting to her nature... scrooge, "a word for a person who is always complaining"... a griper. With her and her crowd controlling our Town government, it's no wonder that Town staff are rude, uncooperative, and that nothing gets done right. Welcome to the Town of Scrooge!
Posted by: Town Green | September 2, 2007 07:22 PM
“This will compensate for all the other times that I'm a Scrooge,” Robinson said. Translation (and its not too subtle either) MY TOWN. I OWN IT. I OPERATE IT!
You know we keep getting these gems from Maud in which offers great insight into who she is, and what she believes, but sadly it is ignored.
Posted by: frustrated | September 3, 2007 09:44 AM
So now Bukont is going for 2 houses on Glyndon. I wonder how that lot coverage will work out. Also what is going on with his desire to put up the Townhouses on Berry?
Posted by: frustrated | September 3, 2007 11:10 AM
I have a question and I don't know where to put it -- are those houses on Berry Street (at the 7-11 end) single family homes or are the boarding houses of some type? Also, is it the same builder who is building them? They look.....interesting....
Posted by: Ms. Hopkins | September 13, 2007 04:37 PM
you mean the white brick MEGA-mansion-palaces?!
i have yet to figure out how the berry/east street residents are screaming over bukont's condos when they will be more attractive/desirable than those monstrocities.
how come no one is down at town hall screaming about those being built in the neighborhood? i would go ballistic if that was put next door to me.
Posted by: house patrol | September 19, 2007 09:36 AM
I tried to get the Town to answer questions on the lot coverage issue. The answer was that I could "do it myself". They refuse to answer questions about properties that anyone with a glance can see that the coverage is well beyond the 25 % limit. The Town is totally inconsistent and not truthful about the issue. I personally calculated the coverage on a number of properties in the SE area and found them to be over the 25 % limit
Posted by: Dusgusted | September 27, 2007 09:59 AM
What is the situation with that white unfinished monstrosity on Tapawingo Rd? It has been years in various stages of construction? Who owns it? Do they live there? Those poor neighbors...
Posted by: Dolce | September 27, 2007 09:49 PM
Good question. Maud, got an explanation?
Posted by: HV | September 27, 2007 10:32 PM
I'm having trouble letting this issue go - everywhere I go in Vienna, I find myself checking out the size of the house and trying to estimate the lot coverage. I don't want to call or write letters right now, because my project is now in progress and I don't want to fail the inspections. The violations seem so unbelievably blatant.
The white house on Tapawingo is a good example. The red Ayrhill one on Glyndon seems like another. Practically every newer house in Vienna seems to be over 25%. So why not MY house?!
Posted by: original poster | September 30, 2007 10:40 AM
I know from my experience that our lot is almost 17,000 sq feet and our new home is 23.5% lot coverage including our asphalt driveway. From the front, it looks like we are over but our back yard is deceptively big.
I still think the one on Plum/Battle looks awfully big for the property.
Will the town give you their calculations for lot coverage on specific properties through a FOIA? Are these people slipping through because they do not factor in a driveway & instead use pavers that count for less coverage?
Posted by: vienna mommy | October 1, 2007 11:09 AM
The houses on Berry all belong to the same Persian/Iranian family. They're like the Kennedy compounds. :-) Or so they think.
Posted by: SW neighbor | October 3, 2007 02:59 AM