This Is How The Maud Uses Our Police For Her Own Petty Political Purposes

After the Post office was made many years back the road did a dead end behind then, the steak @ Ale. The Windover heights Asso requested that they road be open for their benefit. Which made sense. I don;t know way this old issue is returning to this site. The road decision was made before Seeman or Maude were in office. Not defending them but when the facts are wrong it needs to be addressed.

After the Post office was made many years back the road did a dead end behind then, the steak @ Ale. The Windover heights Asso requested that they road be open for their benefit. Which made sense. I don;t know way this old issue is returning to this site. The road decision was made before Seeman or Maude were in office. Not defending them but when the facts are wrong it needs to be addressed.

Nice try, no cigar. That road was closed by Maud's husband and Jane's husband. So you think Maud had no power back in the day? She was just some housewife dipping around Town with not a political bone in her body? And of course the twins themselves voted less than 5 years ago to keep it closed. Any one else got some BS spin they call "facts" to throw on the issue?

I don;t know way this old issue is returning to this site.
Do you believe that once a decision has been made (especially a poor one) that it should not ever be reviewed again?
This area has increased traffic and these items need to keep being revisited until someone does something for that area that makes sense. For both cars and pedestrians.

WHEN THE USPO WAS MOVED TO ITS PRESENT LOCATION FROM CHURCH ST, THIS SECTION OF CHURCH ST WAS BARRICADED IN BOTH DIRECTIONS DUE TO THE RESULTING DUMB INTERSECTION AT LAWYERS RD AND SOME PEOPLE ON WINDOVER THOUGHT, IF OPENED, IT WOULD INCREASE TRAFFIC ON THEIR STREET (GO FIGURE). THE FEW PEOPLE ON PLEASANT ST HAD NO OBJECTIONS AND SAID SO. NEVERTHELESS THE STREET WAS FULLY BARRICADED. SEVERAL YEARS LATER THE ISSUE CAME BEFORE COUNCIL BASED ON REQUESTS FROM THE TOWN BUSINESS COMMITTEE. AGAIN THE WINDOVER FOLKS WERE AGAINST ON THE SAME BASIS AND PLEASANT ST FOLKS ARGUED IN FAVOR. THE STREET WAS OPENED TO ITS PRESENT ONE WAY STATUS ON CONDITION THAT TRAFFIC DID NOT INCREASE ON WINDOVER. THEREAFTER, TRAFFIC COUNTS WERE MADE (AFTER MADISON HIGH OPENED FOR THE SCHOOL YEAR, NATCH) BUT THE RESULTING COUNT NEVER OPENLY CAME BEFORE COUNCIL AND THE PRESENT PARTIAL BARRICADE REMAINS. I GUESS THE COUNT DIDN'T SUPPORT THE WINDOVER FOLKS. IT SEEMS TO ME THAT IF LAWYERS ROAD DRIVERS WISH TO GO TO OAKTON AND COULD GO ON CHURCH TO PLEASANT ST AND THEN TO MAPLE, IT WOULD RELIEVE TRAFFIC SOMEWHAT ON LAWYERS RD AS WELL AS WINDOVER. IN ANY EVERT, THE USE OF BARRICADES FOR TRAFFIC CONTROL ON A PERMANENT BASIS IS SILLY, TO PUT IT MILDLY.