« Another Hike in Residential Taxes? | Home Page | Historic Phony's Annual Book Sale »

Vienna Politicians are Big Fat Liars, Case Study No. 2,456: Sidewalks

In March 2007, the below list was published by the Town stating their "sidewalk priorities." One year later, priority number one was completed - the smallest strip of walkway. Has any other piece of sidewalk been built?

The price of gas is $4 and rising. Getting out of our cars and walking to Town is no longer just a whimsical thought - it is a necessity. Town residents must DEMAND safe and plentiful sidewalks in our town. These fifteen priority spots are just some blatant missing pieces in the bizarro Vienna sidewalk puzzle. Everywhere you look, sidewalks disappear so you forced to hop back and forth on streets. We all know this is hard enough for an able body person but what if you have a stroller, a disability, etc.? The Town must stand up and do their jobs.

Do not set priorities if you never, ever have an intention of fulfilling them. Was the list just a feel good measure and the act of creating it was actually an end unto itself?

* A 150-foot-long section of McHenry Street, S.E., between Park and Fardale streets.
* A 2,805-foot area along Windover Ave., N.W., between Lawyers Road and Nutley Street.
* A 1,660-foot section of Plum Street, S.W., between Cottage Street and Harmony Drive.
* A 1,025-foot area along Park Street, N.E., between Church Street and Hilltop Road.
* A 640-foot stretch of Moore Avenue, S.E., between Park Street and Ninovan Road.
* A 1,024-foot section of Lewis Street, N.W., between Orchard Street and Windover Avenue.
* A 625-foot area along Orchard Street, N.W., between Lewis Street and Windover Avenue.
* An 810-foot section of Harmony Drive, S.W., between Cottage Street and the neighborhood's pool and park.
* A 505-foot area along Lawyers Road, N.W., between Blair Court and Abbottsford Road.
* A 750-foot section of West Street, N.W., between Lewis Street and Windover Avenue.
* A 715-foot stretch along Dogwood Street, S.W., between Cottage and Center streets.
* A 1,600-foot area along East Street, S.E., between Maple Avenue and Echols Street.
* A 160-foot stretch of East Street, N.E., between Maple Avenue and Church Street.
* A 300-foot section along Talahi Road, S.E., between Park Street and Ninovan Road.
* A 510-foot area along Nutley Street, N.W., between Maple Avenue and Knoll Street.

Comments

Much of the even side of the 600 block of Tapawingo Road SW has no sidewalk. We didn't even make the list.

Remember what genius Maud says about sidewalks? That they cost "$250,000/linear foot, folks!" I believe the reality is somewhere between $10 & $20/ft. Incidentally, a 350 foot long nuclear submarine costs about $5 billion, or $14,000 per linear foot.

The existing sidewalks are obsolete. Persons are walking on the street instead of on the sidewalks. They are too narrow for two people to walk side by side and converse. Strollers and dogs are also difficult to control on the narrow sidewalks.

There are no new sidewalks because the town is blowing all the money on maintaining the brick sidewalks along "Historic" Church St.

For the past three days I've driven by the two repair guys working on the same 3'x3' patch.

Anne, you lost a few zeros when you tried to do your math. $5 billion divided by 350 is about $14,000,000, not $14,000. Maybe Maud stole your zeros to pad her estimate. . .

We really need sidewalks on Harmony Drive, S.W., between Cottage Street and the Vienna Woods pool. Families and kids walk to the pool, and it really is just a matter of time before someone is hit.

Yes, I did lose some zeros. sorry. Maybe I should forgive Maude for her mistake.

What Maud mistake? By the time they build the sidewalks on their list of priorities they will cost exactly the price per foot that Maud quotes.Likewise with their VDOT projects they would not give up. It would take 42 or even 44 rather than 40 years before VDOT then undertakes the projects.

Post a comment

(All comments need to be approved before they will appear. Until then, they won't appear on the entry. Ground rules? Say something for or against content on the site. Be specific and add value to the discourse. Thanks for waiting!)